Owned: The Chris Wallace story
Look I understand the Grizzlies are the joke of the league right now. We have made some absolutely nonsensical moves i the past couple years beginning with the Pau Gasol trade and ending with, most recently, giving away Hakim Warrick. But could someone please tell the media to stop criticizing Chris Wallace like he is some fool who couldn't tell a basketball from a grapefruit? Chris Wallace is no idiot. He is Michael Heisley's axe man, his fall man.
Remember that book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man that made a little buzz a few years ago? The author John Perkins claimed that the NSA hired him to do everything necessary to trick Third World nations into dependency on the industrialized world, namely the United States. According to his account, the author was allowed to use whatever means necessary to cripple these emerging nations: rigged elections, bribery, extortion, whatever it took to get the job done covertly.
It's easy for the national media to cast Chris Wallace in this light, either villifying him or marginalizing his intelligence because of what he's done to the Grizzlies roster. Wallace is the one who steps up to the podium to announce trades, and most GMs around the league do honestly run their teams. Yes, the owner always has to approve moves, but that typically entails a quick signature. Wallace puts himself out there just by wearing the GM's nametag for a club so devoid of coherent direction.
The problem with criticizing Wallace is that he isn't in control of the team. Note that essentially every Grizzlies rumor this season has noted that there was a split between the opinions of the basketball end of management and the ownership. Also note that the ownership has had their way in each of these rumors--Thabeet, Randolph, and Warrick--with the exception of signing Allen Iverson. For now.
I don't care if John Hollinger and the entire crew from www.82games.com were the co-GMs of Grizzlies, they would get the same results. Michael Heisley calls the shots in Memphis's front office now, and until the "young core" is ready to compete at a high level, which will be at least few years, Wallace is going to be Hanoi Hannah. It's not like Wallace has the ability to tell Heisley "No." And it's not like he's going to quit in protest; a lot of good that would do since half the league and fans considers him a dunce. He wouldn't find another job and wouldn't even garner significant sympathy from parties powerful enough to make Heisley change.
The main problem is that nobody has power in this situation besides, maybe, Stern and the NBA. Fans can't boycott because nobody goes to games already and Heisley makes his cash off trade considerations and league money anyhow. Note that he wanted to sell the team, couldn't find any takers, realized how much cash he could make laundering cap space, and now we don't hear a peep about a sale even though he's clearly not interested in improving the appeal of the team. Other owners won't do anything, having Heisley around to facilitate their team's development is a major perk. Cuban criticized the Pau Gasol trade, but happily paid the Grizzlies to 'third-team' their recent acquisition of Sean Marion. Finally Wallace, trapped just as much or more than any other party, has no option but to suffer through being handsomely paid to dismantle the team's chances for the next few years one press conference at a time.
And because of it all, Grizzlies fans have an excellent read to look forward to. I'm thinking: Confessions of An NBA Hit Man. What, not creative enough?
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
Not to second doubt you or anthing,
but is there any proof that Chris Wallace isn’t in charge of the teams? It could possibly be true that he is his fall man, but why would an owner do that to his own team..?
Mike Smith on Eric Gordon: "The Clippers may have found their go to scorer."
On a second note, I want Novak back!
Evidence
Check this article by Geoff Calkins, reporter for the Memphis Commercial Appeal. An excerpt:
Of course, who needs basketball people around when the owner doesn’t pay attention to what they say? If he did, Hakim Warrick would still be on the team. Nobody on the basketball side endorsed Heisley’s decision to let Warrick walk.
Heading into the offseason, Wallace described Warrick as "one of the most potent bench scorers in the league." At the press conference introducing Hasheem Thabeet, head coach Lionel Hollins said he’d be mixing up the names "Hasheem" and "Hakim" all year long.
Or note the well reported fact Wallace didn’t want Thabeet but Heisley made the call. Or that Heisley still wants to sign AI, as long as he’s cheap, despite "basketball people" advising him against the taking on the distraction.
Heisley is doing it because this way he isn’t losing money while the team’s core isn’t mature enough to compete. If you’re going to have a team that will probably finish under .500 there is no point in spending Wizards money on it, especially when the city doesn’t really support the franchise. Lets face it, even the Blazers weren’t competitive night in and night out till last year, and the Grizzlies young(er) roster isn’t as impressive. As a fan you just have to hope that when players like Mayo and Gay are in their prime they’ll want to stick around and Heisley will pay to surround them with depth.
Straight Outta Vancouver - The Memphis Grizzlies DO Still Exist
You'd think that if the ownership doesnt care, why should the players?
The fans can only wish players like Gay and Mayo have the intentions of sticking around. Reality is, anything can happen within that time zone Mayo or Gay may realize that ownership is out of control and leave the team, forcing Memphis to rebuild again. Anyways, truth be told, if Memphis doesn’t find a way to start winning, those pieces that Memphis was able to put together (Mayo/ Gay/ Conley) could slowly fall apart. With that said, shouldnt Grizz’s be losing money instead of marginal profit/ straight line? I would assume that Grizz’s aren’t doing too well with merchandise selling, and also if I remember correctly, someone (probably you) said that many seats aren’t being sold. I would think that the owner would know that winning games = more butts inside seats?
Mike Smith on Eric Gordon: "The Clippers may have found their go to scorer."
On a second note, I want Novak back!
They make money creatively...
Namely through the combination of cash considerations in trades and keeping their salary extremely low. For instance because Memphis facilitated the Sean Marion trade they were rumored to get several million dollars. And the league automatically gives so much money to every team for media deals, etc.
Ticket sales are only one way a franchise can make cash.
Also its worth noting that Memphis didn’t really support the Grizzlies when they were making the playoffs a few years ago, so the costs of improving are probably actually much greater than the added revenue from ticket sales. It’s a bad situation right now.
More on this in a very long post within the next few days.
Straight Outta Vancouver - The Memphis Grizzlies DO Still Exist
Of course, of course.
Ticket sales are maybe a small fraction of it. But the problem with that is, Memphis doesnt seem to support Grizzs, Memphis fans don’t seem to support Grizzs, seems to me like there shouldnt even be a team there at Memphis at all! Pardon that please. Just randomly saying as I know that there are many people criticizing my Clipper team for having two teams in LA. But truth be told, I don’t mind Grizz’s in Memphis, but I would hope that atleast Grizz would have some support? From Memphis, ownership, fans, anything! But I admire your Grizz spirit. Wondering if you became a fan when Grizz were apart of Vanc. or when they moved to Memphis?
Mike Smith on Eric Gordon: "The Clippers may have found their go to scorer."
On a second note, I want Novak back!

by 















