Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

Weekly Wilson: Heisley, Please

Chris Wilson and I are quickly developing a Geoff Calkins-Ronald Tillery relationship. Money. -djturtleface

Michael Heisley is a billionaire. That's billion, with a "B." Basically, if he wanted to swim around in a pit of money like Scrooge McDuck, he has both the eccentric nature and financial wherewithal to pull that off. He is the 655th richest person in the world according to Forbes Magazine with a net worth of $1.5 billion dollars.

All of this might lead a man to have a healthy bit of ego. I think Michael Heisley would be the first to admit, yes, he does have an ego, and quite frankly, you have no right to comment on how big it is.

Ego is not necessarily a bad thing. Heisley made his fortune on buying distressed assets, improving them, and flipping them for a profit. This takes a massive amount of leadership and direction from the new owner; everything is redone from the ground up and that takes strong input from the top.

However, as any halfway knowledgeable sports fan knows, that's not exactly how professional sports works. In order to be successful, a team's owner needs to not micromanage and let people who have the unique set of skills to run and coach a basketball team do their job. Can anyone name the owner of the Spurs off the top of their head? The Celtics? The Magic? These owners still spend money on their franchises, but get out of the way only to watch them win.

Heisley's ego has come into direct conflict with fans of his franchise. I don't know a single fan who hasn't wanted to hit their head against the wall in the past 13 months. If Memphis had more Grizzlies fans, the structural integrity of the entire city might be at risk. With that said, over the jump let's have a countdown of the five most egregious Heisley ego-trips since the end of the 2008-09 season.

Star-divide

5) Arguing with Arn: Xavier Henry's (and Greivis Vasquez's) contract

Rudy Gay was asked in an interview on the Gary Parrish Show this week how important it is to play in Summer League. He stated something to the effect of "It's really important, I missed games my first year and it hurt me, and I wish Xavier was playing."

Rather than gaining valuable experience and bonding with his teammates, Xavier Henry, the Grizzlies' latest lottery pick, is sitting out summer league because of a contract dispute. I know what you're thinking, and the answer is yes, NBA first round contracts are guaranteed and scaled according to where a player was drafted. But remember, this is Michael Heisley's ego we're dealing with. He can and did still mess it up.

Heisley has told Henry's agent Arn Tellum that he is only willing to pay 100% of the rookie contact. Sounds normal, right? Wrong. Last year all 30 first rounders are received 120% of their rookie scale, as is customary and accepted throughout the NBA, including Thabeet and Demarre Carroll. So, in order to save under a million bucks on a $58 million payroll, Henry isn't getting the chance to become a better basketball player. And is probably pissed.

As noamschiller tweeted, "The Memphis Grizzlies have saved $800K so they can turn Ronnie Brewer and Xavier Henry into Tony Allen and a very angry Xavier Henry."

4) Cowering to Cuban: Selling a 2010 first rounder

Heisley is often like the kid at the lunch table who really wants to be accepted, so he craps on his real friends (the fans) only to suck up to the cool kid (Mark Cuban). He can only be cool by association, by having other owners "respect" him and tell him he's doing a great job.

The Grizzlies had the 25th pick in this year's first round, via Denver. Heisely then turned around and sold that pick to Mark Cuban for $3 million. When asked if he was concerned about giving up a first round pick to a division rival, Heisley responded with "There were several teams offering the same terms. I chose Dallas because Mark is a friend. It doesn't concern me that he is in our Division." Thanks Mike!

3) Rolling with Rudy: Gay cashes in

Rudy Gay turned down a 5 year, $50 million dollar offer in the summer of 2009. This made sense for Rudy, as he thought he could get more the following summer on the open market. This also made sense for the Grizzlies, as they didn't want to overpay Rudy, and they would still have the option of a sign-and-trade the following summer. Everything makes sense, right? Of course not.

Before the 09-10 season even ended, Heisley came out and stated that the Grizzlies will resign Rudy "no matter what." Despite the fact that logical media members, fans, and oh, everyone, knew that a long term max deal could very well hamstring the franchise financially, Heisley insisted on offering a $83 million dollar near-max on the second day of free agency.  That's about $12 million more than any othe team could have paid him, and the Grizzlies had the right to match.

But we kept Rudy Gay, by god, and that's what Michael Heisley said he would do.

2) Aiming for Allen: The Grizzlies give a contract to Allen Iverson

It became known late in the summer of 2009 that the Grizzlies didn't plan to extend the qualifying offer to Hakim Warrick. This wasn't entirely out of the norm, but Warrick did give the team valuable scoring off the bench, was something of a fan and clubhouse favorite, and he would have cost the Grizzlies only about $3 million.

Around a month later, after the worst season of his career and every other NBA team had turned him down, Allen Iverson was introduced to the Grizzlies on a one-year, $3 million dollar contract.

When asked why the Grizzlies picked up Iverson despite a glut of backcourt players, among other reasons, Heisley stated how Iverson had gone to Georgetown and was outstanding there (Heisley is a Georgetown graduate) and his wife was a huge Allen Iverson fan.

Rather than discussing the Hindenburg-level disaster that was the Answer, let's go easy for Mrs. Heisley's sake.

1) The Terrible Tanzanian: Grizzlies draft Hasheem Thabeet with the second pick.

I remember sitting at a draft lottery party at Buffalo Wild Wings (only in Memphis) and how excited I was when the Grizzlies were not in their slated spot. I remember being disappointed we didn't get the number one pick, but still being really excited. The number two pick could change a franchise!

I  leave you with this video as perfect evidence of Michael Heisley's ego: 

- Chris Wilson

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This is mind bottling...

I mean my mind is IN a bottle over this deal. I can somewhat understand making bad picks and taking bad contracts…but not paying these dudes??? Is any other team NOT paying their 1st rdr the max? Pathetic.

by JTG322 on Jul 20, 2010 3:44 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

“There were several teams offering the same terms. I chose Dallas because Mark is a friend. It doesn’t concern me that he is in our Division.”

That is absolutely crazy. I can’t believe I just read that.

Regarding Thabeet, who did Wallace want? Do we know? Of course drafts are easy in hindsight, but at the time was there an indication that Memphis was interested in Evans?

by Michael White on Jul 20, 2010 4:46 PM CDT reply actions  

I think the rumors have Wallace wanting Evans...

And the Barone’s really wanted Stephen Curry. Apparently Curry was close to being picked, but they thought he was a reach, too similar to Mayo, and wanted to give Conley one more year.

Straight Outta Vancouver - The Memphis Grizzlies DO Still Exist

by djturtleface on Jul 20, 2010 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

It does make sense

I mean Curry and OJ on the same team?

I mean at the time Curry didn’t look like a 2nd pick and I don’t believe Curry is exactly franchise changing. Then again, nobody really was after Blake Griffin. Maybe Rubio, but Rubio was very clear he didn’t want to be in Memphis..

by JackduhSun on Jul 21, 2010 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

If they had taken Curry, it would certainly have been called a reach that night, but this is our professional staff evaluating him. They saw the same thing we saw we all saw later when he went off. You should trust yourself over the consensus.

Straight Outta Vancouver - The Memphis Grizzlies DO Still Exist

by djturtleface on Jul 22, 2010 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ahaha what can I say?

I was thinking of either Rubio, Harden, or Evans should have been #2. Evans because he was most polished (but it seemed like he had the least potential), Harden because he looked looked good with alot of potential to get better, and Rubio because of his hype.

Ohwell. We’ll see how Harden does as the years continued.

by JackduhSun on Jul 22, 2010 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

@jtg322 I haven’t heard of any other teams not paying their first rounders.

@ Michael White According to both Tillery and Herrington, it went like this
Barone Sr. = Thabeet
Barone Jr. = Curry
Wallace = Evans

Which all leads to Heisley = Idiot

by clwilson02 on Jul 20, 2010 10:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Sterling...

He’s a racist and sexist. Heisley is just a bad GM in his first year trying to be one.

Straight Outta Vancouver - The Memphis Grizzlies DO Still Exist

by djturtleface on Jul 22, 2010 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ehh

I don’t get the anti Heisley sentiment.

The guy who signs the pay checks and is the main reason why there is even a franchise at all in Memphis, or the guys who don’t go to many games, don’t know how to support anything and spend more time criticising the team then supporting it? I know it’s a part of American culture to be this way, but it doesn’t mean I have to like it. I have seen this aspect of Memphis fans (and inferiority complex) ever since the 2003 season. During the playoff years it was all about what they don’t have, rather then celebrating the highs. I am not talking about ALL Grizz fans, but a LARGE portion. There is only 2 or 3 home games per season that get a trully electric crowd. Meanwhile places like New Orleans or Oklahama is electric all season long. I watched the Pacers road game last season, the Pacers were hopeless while Memphis blew them out. And the crowd was still cheering, despite being down 20-30!!!!

To me it’s an easy choice. I pick Heisley. Is he perfect? Heck no. Not even close. Is he a tight ass? Yes. But it’s his money, he was over the cap in earlier seasons and for Memphis that didn’t work. The whole staff are building something, so I am positive. You see what happened in Miami recently, and the huge jealousy through out the league about it. It reminds you how hard teams like Cleveland and Memphis have it, in terms of attracting superstars and winning the whole thing. Memphis is just 1 of 30 teams, trying to climb the ladder. It’s tough. Last season was good though, there were plenty of enjoyable games. This season can be even better.

Points 5 and 4 I can agree with. Iverson? I hate his guts, always have, but Heisley rolled the dice and crapped out. At least he tried. It could have been great. Thabeet will never be seen as being worthy of that #2 pick, but he still has the chance of being the best stopper the Grizz have ever had. Which would be something. It’s not the points (1-5) I have a problem with, it’s the tone. The tone of “I know more about this stuff then the billionaire owner who runs my team”. Would you say these things to him personally face to face? I know I wouldn’t want to. To me, your either supporting or “hating”. Again, I know it’s American culture, but I don’t get it. It’s like you wake up and tell your family you love them by screaming at them and calling them names. It’s a funny type of support.

If I felt so strongly about Heisley, I wouldn’t be a Grizz fan, simple as that. If you hate your wife, you get divorced. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Some of these opinions though, I can’t relate to them or understand them. It’s obvious to me that with a different owner, everything wouldn’t magically be 1000x better. Same thing with all the coaches over the years. This post has been aimed at the “hate” towards Memphis owner, coaches, coaching staff, GM’s etc by the city (or fans) as a whole over the years. Not 100% directly at this post, so don’t take it too personally.

by AussieG on Jul 22, 2010 5:01 AM CDT reply actions  

My take as the editor is...

That the whole thing is from the frame of “Why the hell is our owner making our basketball decisions, and doing a pretty bad job of it?”

We all became fans before Heisley started running the team. All the starters were in place before Heisley started running the team (with the exception of Zach Randolph, who was a player targeted by Chris Wallace anyhow).

I have much less Heisley hate then either the national NBA writers or Chris, but even I’m legitimately worried about him deciding to run the team. He’s made so many little mistakes because managing a professional sports team is not something he has experience in. For example, not restricting Hakim and Brewer to sign-and-trade them, when you’re well below the luxury tax, is just stupid.

You’re absolutely right that it’s an uphill battle, but getting (and keeping) those extra picks, saving that little bit of extra money (failing to sign Rudy to 5/60 instead of 5/80), etc. is what makes a small market team have a shot at success.

Straight Outta Vancouver - The Memphis Grizzlies DO Still Exist

by djturtleface on Jul 22, 2010 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Garbage.

Saying ‘its Heisley’s money…he can do what he wants’ is stupid. When I pay my cable bill, buy a ticket, buy a hat/shirt/jersey, etc. I am ‘paying’ Heisley. And this is a BLOG…which is opinion based, so yeah dude has the right to say whatever he wants. Just b/c you like the team, doesn’t mean you have to like the owner, the coach or even every player on the team. And there is NO way the Iverson situation could have been great…just like Thabeet…etc etc. Heisley can’t separate his fan-hood from his self appointed responsibility of running the team. If he could, neither of those choices would have been made.

Memphis can’t be like NO or OKC b/c 1)the owner…do you even know who the owners are for the other two teams?….nope b/c they let people run the team and don’t have to be in the headlines. 2) No superstars…and that’s b/c of #1.

by JTG322 on Jul 22, 2010 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fair enough, however...

I don’t take it personally at all, but I do have a couple of counter points:

1) We could very easily have the Hornets in memphis too- The Grizzlies and the Hornets both put in applications on the same day to move to Memphis. If Heisley hadn’t moved here, it’s likely someone would have.

2) I don’t buy the “It’s his money” argument at all. He’s the owner of an NBA team- people don’t own these franchises to make money. That’s why you never see anyone who’s sole money-maker is owning a pro franchise. This is akin to you or me buying a really expensive car, and then neglecting to change its oil or clean the windshield. Certain things just come with the territory.

3) I would absolutely tell Heisley these things to his face- I put it on the internet with my own name for anyone and everyone to read, so I stand by what I write. And I’m sorry, but you can’t defend the Thabeet pick at 2. 27? Sure. Not at 2.

4) The “you’re either supporting or you’re hating” line is bogus. You compare it to a family- if your son or daughter touches a hot stove, you expect them to learn and not touch it again, right? You wouldn’t want them to keep touching the stove. And touching it again, then touching it twice more for good measure. You would want them to stop, right? Same principle.

5) The post isn’t hate- the post is showing where Heisley has absolutely no idea what he’s doing when it comes to running a basketball team. I want the best for my team and the best for my city, and yes, even as a columnist, I feel that I do know more about this stuff than the billionaire who runs the team. He has dozens of other businesses, lives in Chicago, and attends less than 10 games a year. I have season tickets, write about the Grizzlies in my spare time, and spend a good deal of my own money, time, and effort on this team. I feel uniquely qualified to tell someone that if he wants more success, he should leave it in the hands of people who are trained to be successful- delegate instead of micro-manage.

And, I would never, ever sell a pick to Mark Cuban. Screw that guy.

by clwilson02 on Jul 22, 2010 8:25 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Memphis Grizzlies.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Crazy_kids_small
Weathering the Storm Without Your Captain
Rudy-gay_small
Players I would trade Rudy for

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editors

Small Griffin Gotta

92620351_small TLorenzo

Authors

Rudy-gay_small ForeignFlopper

5449_1185754491845_1467777039_30486370_3889376_n_small Mark Travis

Ddd_small marcus.privitt